Appellate judges typically have more time and resources to review briefs than trial judges, and are often more concerned with the overall coherence of the law rather than the result in your particular case. That being so, writing an appellate brief requires viewing the case through a broader – yet more rigorous – lens than was used below. It also requires telling a compelling story about your case to judges otherwise unfamiliar with it. Having worked as a federal law clerk for over two years, Nick has a keen sense of what judges will want to know before ruling in your favor. Both in briefing and at oral argument, he addresses the complexities of the case in a straightforward manner, answering questions the judges have and establishing credibility for his clients.

Appeals within a regulatory agency require unique considerations. Every agency is different, and it is crucial to understand the culture, procedures, and distinctive jargon used by the decisionmakers in your case. Understanding this need, Nick researches the agency’s tendencies and prior decisions to present the most compelling arguments on appeal. He has represented clients in many agency proceedings, including matters before the local zoning boards, military correction boards, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the United States Coast Guard.

Not all attorneys enjoy hunkering down in a library, pouring over case law, and meticulously selecting each word and phrase of a brief. If you’d rather be doing something else, we’re happy to help with research and writing. Depending on your preference, Nick can either join your team as co-counsel or can work behind the scenes on a freelance basis. We offer both hourly and flat-fee rates for these services.